We are dedicated to the Camaro | Firebird | TransAm f body platform. Our goal is to bring you as much information as possible related to LT1, LS1 powered f body cars. We promise to provide information that will make owning and working on these cars easier. If you have any questions after browsing through the tech articles, please feel free to sign-up. Registration is free and you will be able to post and ask other memebers questions.
Moderator: 2fast4u88
mrbadlt1 wrote:he mentioned to me yesterday that he has a misfire, im thinking he needs a new opti, and some plugs hes running autolites

2fast4u88 wrote:I said 255 is suppose to be the max. It depends on who you ask and what you are told on all the forums out there and even shoe has said that it supposably goes to 255. But then 160 is also said to be the max it goes to. See what I'm saying everyone says 160 is the max but supposably goes to 255. If it does or not I couldn't tell you since I've never seen it. I have seen it hit 160 and stay there. No higher at all. Even though either of the programs goes to 255 doesn't mean the car in ? does.
Though as I said it may go that high I just never seen it. I know mine didn't on the 383 when I was playing with the butterflys. And yes I am sure it works that way. As I said the whole time with a vaccum leak on a speed density it will close the iac to correct for a vaccum leak since it will cause a high idle.
If it was a maf system the slightest leak will cause more problems along the line of stalling. To the point it won't run period. I also told you it won't go in closed loop because of the o2 failure. That is if the code it active when it trys too.
Leeroy dumb ? why did you just set here and say the same thing I did about the iac. You said I was wrong about? I thought you couldn't look at the iac? Now of course I didn't see any log where it was commanding the iac to 0 though. The one I seen it was being commanded open. Which was the difference. The iac was bad which I had figured from a high iac count and vaccum leaks. Where it should have been the opposite. That was what I was tryinging to say the whole time.
If it was working right. And no one played with the butterfly set screw to set the tps to .63 it probably would have been a good thing to go off to tell you the problem.
Encryptshun wrote:well it wasnt the Opti causing the backfiring and surging. i have no clue

ShowNoMercy wrote: your telling me, im making fucking panckaes

mmd8x28 wrote:It NEEDS a new harness first and foremost I feel at this point. Without a good harness you'd never know for sure what's going on.

ShowNoMercy wrote: your telling me, im making fucking panckaes


Return to L99 / LT4 / LT1 Tech
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests